Skip to content

Faculty Dashboard

Cohort insight & feedback

Monitor progress across the cohort, surface common reasoning errors, and manage student feedback — the evidence base for iterative course improvement.

Demo analytics

Illustrative cohort analytics for FAIMER demonstration; real analytics will be generated after authenticated deployment and ethics-approved implementation.

Aggregate view of cohort performance.

72%completion

Mean completion

across all live cases

Enrolled students

48

Active this week

39

Cases live

11

Case-wise completion & decision accuracy

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus81% completed

Mean branching-decision accuracy: 76%

Hypertension74% completed

Mean branching-decision accuracy: 69%

Antenatal Care61% completed

Mean branching-decision accuracy: 82%

Mean SCT scores

Chronic Disease Reasoning68% · 44 attempts
Maternal & Child Health Reasoning74% · 37 attempts
Chart placeholder — box-plots of concordance can render here.

OSCE / OSPE checklist performance

StationMeanWeakest step
BP Measurement & Counseling71%Explaining need for repeat readings
Antenatal Danger-Sign Counseling66%Checking patient understanding
OSPE — Growth Chart78%Identifying growth-faltering point

Common reasoning errors

Frequency across the cohort — targets for teaching.

Treating before confirming a biochemical diagnosis34%

Linked case: Type 2 Diabetes

Acting on a single BP reading (anchoring)41%

Linked case: Hypertension

Missing complication screening at diagnosis28%

Linked case: Type 2 Diabetes

Under-ordering baseline antenatal investigations22%

Linked case: Antenatal Care

Not escalating on red-flag findings19%

Linked case: Multiple

Topic-wise performance heatmap

Illustrative cell colouring (green ≥75%, amber 50–74%, rose <50%) — a quick scan for which topics need attention.

CaseCompletionDecision accuracy
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus81%76%
Hypertension74%69%
Antenatal Care61%82%

Actionable teaching recommendations

Illustrative, derived from the reasoning-error pattern above — what to do about it in the next facilitated session.

Add a mini-lecture on diagnostic thresholds before the NCD cases

34% of students treated before confirming a biochemical diagnosis.

Run a 10-minute pre-case briefing on FPG/RBS/HbA1c thresholds and repeat-testing rules before assigning the diabetes case.

Debrief anchoring bias explicitly after the hypertension case

41% of students acted on a single BP reading — the most frequent error in the cohort.

Facilitate a short group discussion on measurement variability and white-coat effect immediately after students complete the case.

Pair the diabetes case with the foot-risk OSCE station

28% missed complication screening at diagnosis.

Schedule the Diabetes Foot-Risk Screening OSCE station in the same week as the diabetes case to reinforce complication screening as routine.

Add a checklist prompt for baseline antenatal investigations

22% under-ordered baseline antenatal investigations.

Introduce a one-page baseline-investigation checklist during the antenatal-care skills session, cross-referenced to the MCP card.

Reinforce red-flag escalation across all cases

19% did not escalate on red-flag findings — a cross-cutting pattern, not case-specific.

Add a standing "red flags" recap at the start of each facilitated session, referencing examples from prior cases.

Feedback management

2 new

The community-screening step really changed how I think about individual patients.

Student A21 · Type 2 Diabetes

New

Would like more cases on resistant hypertension and secondary causes.

Student B07 · Hypertension

New

The danger-sign counseling checklist was very useful for OSCE prep.

Student C14 · Antenatal Care

Reviewed